Authority
External authority
This is the one Harpd score that cannot be improved by shipping more Harpd code. It measures whether anyoneoutside Harpd cites, links or reuses Harpd data. Right now the honest answer is: not yet.
0/100
No external authority
Almost no third-party references.
How the score works
Each verified third-party reference scores by type. Harpd-owned domains (harpd.com, *.harpd.com, github.com/harpd-dev) are filtered out before counting, and anything not yet confirmed by a human scores zero.
| Reference type | Points | Counted |
|---|---|---|
| Academic reference | 18 | 0 |
| News reference | 15 | 0 |
| Dataset citation | 12 | 0 |
| Research citation | 10 | 0 |
| GitHub reference | 8 | 0 |
| Backlink | 6 | 0 |
| Brand mention | 3 | 0 |
Score bands
- 0–30No external authorityAlmost no third-party references.
- 30–50Some mentionsOccasional third-party mentions.
- 50–70Regular referencesRegular third-party references.
- 70–85Recognised data sourceReferenced as a data source.
- 85–95Strong industry referenceFrequently cited by industry publications.
- 95–100Widely cited authorityWidely cited independent authority.
The citation flywheel
Where Harpd is today in the loop that turns data into external authority.
- Research/research/live
- Dataset/data/live
- Discovery Index/discovery/live
- Citation/cite/live
- GitHub releaseharpd-rank-datasetlive
- External reusethird-party sitespending
- External citationthird-party articlespending
- AI citationanswer enginespending
Reuse the data
Every Harpd dataset is CC BY 4.0. If you are writing about AI products, developer tools or the AI market, you can reuse the numbers with attribution — and the citation hub gives you the exact string to paste.