Methodology

Measure on real tasks, publish the method

Every number Harpd shows traces back to a documented method. We measure on real tasks, with published methods, and we separate measured results from modeled estimates — always.

Answer

Harpd uses four methodologies: sourcing verified model prices, deciding when a cheaper model is safe to switch to, computing cost per successful task, and running reproducible real-task benchmarks. Each is written down and reproducible.

Evidence
  • Verified prices from official provider pages
  • Real-task quality gates for model replacement
  • Cost per successful task, not per token
  • Reproducible benchmark runs with published artifacts

Our measurement principle

We hold one line across all four methodologies:

We measure on real tasks, with published methods, and we separate measured results from modeled estimates.

Three consequences follow from that principle:

  • Real tasks, not toy prompts. A model is judged on the work you actually run — JSON extraction, code generation, classification, prose — not a generic leaderboard question.
  • Published methods. Every methodology page states the exact procedure, the success definition, and the data used, so the measurement is repeatable.
  • Measured vs. modeled, never mixed. If a figure is modeled or not yet measured, it is labeled as such and visually distinguished. We never present an estimate as a result.